There are lots of pretty photos in this entry. Feel free to scroll down to them if you don’t feel like reading. They’re not my photos though — but you get lots of those next week!
For the rest of the week you’ll likely get more highly interesting (or perhaps boring) posts on the Faroe Islands. If you didn’t know, or you’ve only just discovered the delightfully British realm of my blog, I’m going on holiday on the 13th July — next Monday! I have to admit, when I realised I was leaving in under a week I squealed with both excitement and worry. I think you’re meant to do lot of preparatory work before flying into a cold, rainy, desolate middle-of-nowhere island. A lot of preparation which I’ve kind of skipped doing so far. Oops.
I blame this blog! I’m writing when I should be cleaning my camera lenses! I’m shoving frozen peas down my shorts when I ought to be making sure I have enough clean jumpers (sweaters) to keep me warm!
Anyway, I have done a little research into what will be my home for 17 days (which is an awfully long time to spend in the middle of the Atlantic ocean, I tell you!)
First, a more detailed map.
If you’re wondering how big these islands are, the simple answer is ‘small’; the exact answer is: from north to south it’s 70 miles (113km) and from east to west only 47 miles (75km)! There are 18 islands which have a rather grand total area of 545 square miles (1400km2) — the UK, by comparison, is 94,000 square miles. And the UK is small (the USA is 3.7 million square miles, by the way — you think you have population issues…?) If you click the map, you’ll see where I’m staying — Klaksik — in the the north east, quite close to ‘BORÐOY’. It’s only about 20 miles as the crow flies from the capital Tórshavn but it still takes 50 minutes to drive it (look for the bridges and tunnels between the islands shown by dotted lines, there’s no direct route!)
So I’ll be spending most of my time in a town with a vast population of about 4,500 (the second largest in the country!) The address of where I’m staying is simply the town name followed by a number (‘Klaksik 53′) — how cool is that?! If you’re nodding and saying ‘Cool!’ then good on you; that is why I chose the Faroe Islands! There are only a handful of locations like it in the world, and this is the only one that isn’t tropical.
Anyway, the people — they’re like Vikings, with all the braided beards, horned helmets and daunting tallness removed. I’m told I’ll be the tallest person in the country (…!) I will of course obtain photographic proof that they’re all really short (and cute, in the case of the girls, my host hastened to add). They seem to have kept their Scandinavian looks, but thanks to to the occasional rape-and-pillage by Portugese, Spanish and Turkish sailors there are a few darker-skinned and intense-looking people too. Mostly though, they’re just plain short. Probably due to the inbreeding, if you think about it: 2,000 Viking settlers started it all and almost everyone there today stems from those original bloodlines. First cousins are considered ‘quite distant’ in Faroese terms…
(Incidentally, none of these photos are mine. They all come from Ólavur Frederiksen’s site, a fantastic Faroese photographer.)
There haven’t been any celebrities of International renown (except perhaps for Teitur, a musician) — perhaps on a local or Nordic scale, or if you’re really into ancient Norse texts, you might find some. They’re famous for fishing whales (and their wind-dried sheep) — that’s about it. If you don’t believe me, here’s a list of all their famous people. Leave a comment if you recognise any of them.
On the topic of whales, apparently, if I’m very lucky, I’ll get to participate in a whale hunt! Whaling is part of their culture, their heritage and their livelihood. There aren’t a whole lot of resources in the Faroe Islands; the sea is one of them and whales have provided valuable meat (and blubber!) for centuries. It’s a little sad that it has almost been banned, even though only 950 are caught each year. Is butchering pigs or cows any worse? They’re all mammals…
If only a bloody, sanguine-saturated sea didn’t make for such an awesome photo, eh?
(It was a toss-up between a photo of them jumping jovially through the water, or one of them dead on a beach…)
I won’t actually be killing any whales (I think) — it’s more of an involved process than ‘just’ killing them: there’s a sighting (probably by some ‘official whale scouter’); then the rallying of the whole town (really, the whole town takes part). Then they all jump into boats to hunt and drive them towards the beach. And then… I don’t know. I guess I’ll have to wait and see!
Talking of boats, we’ll have one to get around with. Which is how we’ll get to the tiniest and most remote islands (some of which have a population of… 1) and also how we’ll get to rocks (smaller and less grassy than an ‘island’) that have nothing on them but thousands of puffins. Puffins like these:
It can get a little rough at sea though, which is apparently why we have to stay very close to the coast. If you check the map again and find ‘Suðuroy’ (which we will be visiting), the following video is an example of what the sea can be like during the crossing:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODEYNRa7Oc4[/youtube]
I have a feeling that being able to tread water for 10 minutes might not be all that helpful if we capsize. Hopefully he has life jackets…
Back to the geography: the Faroe Islands are very low-lying (the highest point is only 880m!) but incredibly craggy. Black rock juts out of the short grass and almost nothing grows well there — except for sheep. There are lots and lots of sheep.
Also, I guess because of erosion by both sea and wind, almost every coastline is a cliff. This makes for some terrifying views which I am incredibly eager to photograph. Just look at this:
(Does your stomach flip a little looking down there…?)
And soon, in just 6 days, I’ll be there! Taking photos, hunting whales and eating puffin kebab! Remember, it’s not too late to buy your very own Personalised Faroese Landscape (but it’s probably too late to order in any fancy props, so bear that in mind).
blue soup
Jul 7, 2009
Please smuggle a puffin home…
pinkjellybaby
Jul 7, 2009
Me too…. that puffin looks so cute!
Abi
Jul 7, 2009
Damn that last shot made my stomach flip again.
I’ll take my Puffin in the form of Jerky. Far less problematic, much more easily transportable and easier to conceal down your pants.
Avoid that Tofu cannon at all costs.
Hannah
Jul 7, 2009
a puffin kebab? I’m not sure I approve of that…
If I had $35 I would totally buy a personalized landscape…I would make you dress up as an elf and have you chase down an puffin. Actually I would just want a picture of the 100s of puffins. can you just take one of those without the $35???
sebastian
Jul 7, 2009
For $35, I find some stretch of grass overlooking the sea (not hard), and then chase a puffin across the picture, perhaps with the puffin taking flight to the right of the frame.
I will most likely look a bit like a retard while doing so… but that’s what your money buys!
You think there’s puffin jerky…? Wouldn’t it be a bit… fatty? Cute?
I’m afraid the closest thing you’ll get to a ‘smuggled puffin’ (sounds like some kind of lewd sex act!) is a photo of me holding one. (I have no idea if this is possible, mind. Maybe a baby one…)
Chase
Jul 7, 2009
What a fun trip! And what a strange, funny little island.
Beautiful scenery, though. Can’t wait to see the shots you come up with.
And please toss in some documented proof of being the tallest on the island! Too fun.
Cheers and safe travels!
Yummy, blubber.
…and if you do eat whale, please let us know.
sebastian
Jul 7, 2009
No one’s mentioned the TREACHEROUS seas yet. I’m sure my mother will be around shortly to do so though…
I think whale meat is probably quite tasty — probably nothing like fish… something between fish and cow? *furrows brow* No, that sounds like unpleasant.
Art
Jul 7, 2009
Awesome! But how do you catch a whale? Have you read Moby Dick?
sebastian
Jul 7, 2009
I haven’t read Moby Dick. It’s one of those ‘only in America’ things (like all you can eat buffets *grin*).
I asked my Faroese friend if they used harpoons and he laughed at me: ‘Too easy! Harpoons are way too easy!’
I think they drive them to the beach and then leap into the water with knives. But that’s just a guess…
Meandering Mel
Jul 7, 2009
Love the Shrek ears on your Etsy page.
Have fun on your trip, it sounds awesome!!
sebastian
Jul 7, 2009
I’ll wear nothing BUT Shrek ears, if you pay…!
(But I reserve the right to censor it, unless you pay a lot…)
Art
Jul 7, 2009
I would bring the biggest harpoon I could find anyhow. Can’t wait to hear how it goes.
Jaime
Jul 7, 2009
I can’t WAIT to see all the pictures you come back with, and hear all the stories! You are very lucky to be going. :]
andhari
Jul 7, 2009
Looks fun and cultural, Seb. Small islands sound like exactly what a city girl like me need to escape to from time to time.:)
Eleni
Jul 7, 2009
Hrm. 950 whales a year would be a big number for right whales, seeing as there are only about 350 North Atlantic right whales left. But I see these are pilot whales, which are much more plentiful. I do have to say, though, that it is worse than eating cows or pigs, not from a sympathy standpoint but from a sustainability standpoint. The difference is that whales and dolphins are carnivores (farmed pigs are omnivorous, but my sense is the little meat they’re given is scraps and such–it’s not like they’re hunting fresh meat). If you look at it in terms of energy efficiency and sustainability, the best thing humans can do is be vegan, getting all our nourishment from primary producers. Eating herbivores is inefficient enough (think of how much food you need to feed the cow before you can feed the human off of the cow). Eating carnivores is just a terrible idea in these terms. I guess by that argument we shouldn’t be eating piscivorous fish either (or even zooplanktivorous?), but seeing as some projections predict that the ocean will run out of fish in 50 years, I couldn’t necessarily argue with that.
As long as the whaling is sustainable and the whale population hasn’t decreased year to year because of it (a common problem with food animals that are not farmed), I suppose the practice is defensible. But not all traditions are worth keeping just because they are traditions (see slavery).
Sorry, oceanography nerd
Hope you have a great time! I can’t wait to see the pictures… as long as there aren’t any of bloody water and slaughtered whales. But happy, leaping pilot whales are nice, as are puffins, and ocean, and cliffs… Trouble with me ordering a personalized photo is I wouldn’t know where to ship it to! My address next month is as yet undetermined.
Stephanie
Jul 7, 2009
Can you mail a puffin to me? Just don’t forget to poke holes in the box! BEFORE you put the puffin in.
Hezabelle
Jul 7, 2009
Puffins!!
… and that is my deep and meaningful comment for the day.
sebastian
Jul 7, 2009
I did wonder, as I wrote this entry, if including a cute picture of a puffin would degrade the comments into a long litany of ‘oooh, puffins!!!’ But I gave you the benefit of the doubt, girls! More fool me…
But I can always rely on Eleni to KEEP IT REAL. From what I understand, 950 whales is just a tiny dent in the population of pilot whales. But I appreciate that I don’t know all of the ins and outs of oceanographic stuffs!
I think the point of eating (and milking) cows (and sheep and goats) is that you have a lot of grass that we can’t eat. It would be a waste to not rear livestock (and dairy animals) with our abundance of grass, no?
Sebastian's Mother
Jul 8, 2009
DON’T GET IN ANY BOATS, AT ALL, NOT EVEN A LITTLE ONE, IN FACT ESPECIALLY A LITTLE ONE ( WHY CAN’T I MAKE MY CAPITALS EVEN MORE CAPITALLY?)
IF BY CHANCE YOU DO GET DRAGGED INTO ONE, MAKE SURE YOU HAVE A LIFEJACKET ON. IF YOU FEEL SEA-SICK, STARE AT THE HORIZON. OY VEY……
sebastian
Jul 8, 2009
… yes mum…
Dan
Jul 9, 2009
Looking forward to reading about your trip there.
Eleni
Jul 9, 2009
Wikipedia suggests the yearly catch is around 0.1% of the population. That’s a pretty tiny percentage; the human equivalent would be 6.7 million people–just a drop in the bucket, right? (Environmentally speaking, of course, the world could greatly benefit by losing 6.7 million humans…though I’m not volunteering!) But again, as long as it’s sustainable–the population does not decrease year to year–it is defensible.
I never thought about using cows and goats and such to eat grass because we can’t eat grass but we can eat them. That is very interesting. I haven’t fully thought this through, but I guess in that case, as long as the animals are eating wild-growing and sustainable grass, it’s not so bad. Traditional farms would be fine, but the factory farms would probably not cut it. It’s still inefficient in an ecological footprint sense, requiring a lot of acreage to feed a person off of beef or whatever. And it doesn’t apply to the case of the whale hunt.
sebastian
Jul 9, 2009
Me more than you, Dan…!
I think it’s being banned because of the other whales that probably get harmed in the process. Or commercial trawling is being banned but the whole ‘local hunt’ thing is being kept — not sure! But as you can see, we’re talking about 50,000 people here and 950 whales a year. I looked at the numbers of whales that got killed back during the early 1900s… there used to be hundreds of thousands of blue whales…! Shocking.
You’re one of those ‘we’re overpopulated’ kind of people then?
Just Playing Pretend
Jul 10, 2009
My comment was already used and I have no original thoughts running through my brain.
I can’t not comment though.
It’s a disease.
Magpie
May 16, 2010
“It’s a little sad that it has almost been banned, even though only 950 are caught each year. Is butchering pigs or cows any worse? They’re all mammals…”
It is not sad. It’s a sign that human beings are evolving and not just hanging onto barbaric practices for the sake of ‘tradition’. Whale meat has been proven to contain toxic levels of mercury and is not fit for human consumption. If cows carried similar levels of mercury, their ‘butchering’ would stop. This senseless slaughter of cetaceans is completely inhumane.