Archive for June, 2010

Hire the geniuses

I’ve been watching Boston Legal recently. In it there’s a character called Alan Shore who uses his passionate, mellifluous voice to devastating effect in courtroom closing arguments. In an episode I just watched he argues that the U.S. government should ‘hire the geniuses’, rather than public sector contractor cronies. It’s not actually his best closing (his ‘Free Religion’ one is amazing), but later, talking to his buddy Denny Crane, he says it a lot more succinctly:

Hire the geniuses, not the guy who’s got the best lobbyist, or the rich friend who’ll take you to his quail ranch and let you shoot ‘em. Hire the thinkers [...] Instead of every Tom, Dick and Brownie, let’s turn our visionaries loose.

He makes a damn good point. You would be flabbergasted at the amount of money that governments around the world spend on bloated public sector contracts. Imagine giving ‘The Steves’ (Jobs, Wozniak, Ballmer) just a tiny fraction of the $3.5 trillion that the U.S government spends each year.

Just recently news emerged that cops in Massachusetts will soon be equipped with souped-up iPhones capable of making positive identifications in the field. I mean… what the frak? Why are police only now being equipped with technology that has been in the hands of consumers for years?!

I wonder what the world would be like if our teachers, police and other civil servants had access to the same technology as bleeding-edge tech-savvy consumers. Surely it would be good to put advanced technology in the hands of those that spend their days trying to improve society.

Posted via web from thoughts on things

If you like what you've read, or seen, or heard, subscribe to my RSS feed!

Alternatively, if you're new here, you might want to find out more about me, the author. Or perhaps you want to hear a posh Brit rant on about anything and everything (podcasts), or you want to read something more serious?

43 of 52

Elton & Tina

Seb: Unlike Abi, music didn’t enter my life in a big way until Napster and the Era of Downloadable Music. That’s not to say my life was devoid of music! It was always around, either played by my mother in the house, or loudly on my dad’s car stereo, but I never had my own music.

I tried to get into pop music, when I was a teenager. I wasn’t under the duress of peer pressure for long, but for one painful totally-not-being-myself year I listened to the radio. I tried to record songs like Spaceman onto a tape. I even bought Britney Spear’s first album — believe it or not, it was my first ever CD!

Anyway, to cut a long story short: for the first 15 years of my life I only listened to whatever my parents were playing. Today, I look at the list of songs below and simply marvel at how accurately they reflect my current music tastes. God knows I’ve travelled the gamut — jazz, musical theatre, heavy rock — but I just keep coming back to soul, disco and Burt Bacharach.

I suspect I’ve listened to each of these songs at least a thousand times in the last 26 years — each one is a masterpiece, each one is a part of my soul.

For the Europeans: Spotify playlist
For everyone else: Last FM playlist (some of these aren’t the correct versions!)

And the list, in plain ol’ text:
1. This Old Heart of Mine — The Isley Brothers
2. Ain’t No Mountain High Enough — Diana Ross
3. You Make Me Feel Brand New — The Stylistics
4. You Make Loving Fun — Fleetwood Mac
5. Bennie And The Jets — Elton John
6. Somebody To Love — Queen
7. Endless Love — Diana Ross & Lionel Richie
8. Sentinel — Mike Oldfield
9. You Are Everything — Diana Ross & Marvin Gaye
10. Make It With You — Bread
11. The Right Thing To Do — Carly Simon
12. This Guy’s In Love With You — Diana Ross & The Temptations
13. Let’s Stay Together — Al Green
14. More Than A Woman — Tavares
15. That Lady – Part 1 & 2 — The Isley Brothers
16. Under Pressure — Queen & David Bowie

* * *

Abi: I’m not even exaggerating when I say that Music is one of the most important things in my life. I live and breathe the stuff and have done ever since I can remember. I am acutely aware that I can be a musical bore, but somehow that never really bothers me, not when it’s this important. My earliest memories involve music, partly due to my parents highly evolved and eclectic tastes. My Mother jokes I came out dancing and its true, I don’t think I can recall a time when I havent been toe tapping or “wrist twisting”.

This photograph was taken at Christmas, I must have been about three years old when I got my first Sony Walkman. I had had a record player in my room since birth. The Walkman is now an ipod but I don’t think I have been without headphones since.

One of my earliest memories involves sitting on a booster seat in my Dads car, listening to casettes that were stored in a red box. Many of those songs appear on this list, some are a direct influence from my Mother, who would listen to Motown and Disco as she cleaned. My Father, a brilliant guitarist, ingrained artists such as Hendrix and Clapton into my conciousness. “House of the Rising Sun” and “Sultans of Swing”, the reasons I first picked up a guitar. I only have to listen to the opening of “All along the Watchtower” to turn to someone (anyone!) and quote my Dad ” This is as close to perfection as it gets (Abigail)”.Whenever I hear Marvin’s vocal swoop into the menacing beat of “Heard it through the Grapevine” I am watching my beautiful Mother dance around the kitchen like the coolest thing ever. An obsessive list maker, these are the songs I turn to time and time again, they are the reason I love what I love and the spark that ignited my passion. As my list is pretty long, there are also gaping omissions, some of the tracks here represent whole albums, which I urge you to listen to in their entirity and the works of some influencial artists, which shaped the sounds I champion today. I have barely scratched the surface of my musical education, which is ongoing. This list represents who I was and who I have become.

I worry for my kids.

My (extremely difficult to put together) List: Listen in full here

Sultans of Swing — Dire Straits
Karma Chameleon — Culture Club
Saturday Night’s Alright For Fighting — Elton John
Nutbush City Limits — Ike and Tina Turner
I heard it through the Grapevine — Marvin Gaye
Higher Ground — Stevie Wonder
I just called to say I love you — Stevie Wonder
All Along the Watchtower — Jimi Hendrix Experience
The Show must go on — Queen
Free Fallin’  – Tom Petty
Diamond Dogs — David Bowie
Dirty Diana — Michael Jackson
The House of the Rising Sun — The Animals
Honky Tonk Woman — The Rolling Stones
Chain of Fools — Aretha Franklin
I feel the earth move — Carole King
Piece of my Heart — Janis Jopin
Go Your Own Way — Fleetwood Mac
Layla — Eric Clapton (Derek and the Dominos)
Purple Rain — Prince and the Revolution
Wuthering Heights — Kate Bush
Love to Love you Baby — Donna Summer

* * *

Seb’s Flickr stream / Abi’s Flickr stream

Etymology: -phil- (φίλος)

Suffixes with the common part -phil- (-phile, -philia, -philic) are used to specify some kind of attraction or affinity to something, in particular the love or obsession with something. They are antonymic to suffixes -phob-.

Phil- (Philo-) may also be used as a prefix with a similar meaning.

I think I’ve told you about my love of etymology.

For me, there’s nothing as divine as true understanding — and the first barrier to understanding is not actually understanding the words.

Now, admittedly, you could go through life without ever knowing the roots of words. Most people do. But the added richness of knowing derivations, the additional nuance and flavour… well, to me it’s unrivalled!

Call me a nerd, but I just LOVE that little lip-formed ‘o’ that people make when I tell them the derivation of a word. Sometimes it’s a vapid ‘o’ of not-quite-understanding, but sometimes it’s of the omg-my-world-view-has-just-totally-changed variety.

To the case in point: philia, philos, phil — Greek (φίλος) for ‘beloved’ or ‘dear’. Now, you certainly know the suffix form — paedophile, cinephilia, Anglophilic. But the prefix form… ahhh!

Philosophy! A love of wisdom.

Philadelphia! Brotherly love.

Philanthropy! Love of fellow humans.

Philanderer! Loving or fond of men (but probably after someone called Philander).

But the word I was actually looking up, which led me to ‘phil’, is Philharmonic. It’s just one of those words that you see around — but I bet you didn’t know what it means. Until now! It literally means ‘the beloved sound’. Very simple, yet I bet most orchestras don’t even know why they’re called ‘philharmonic’.

There, done. That wasn’t too boring, was it?

Posted via web from thoughts on things

Chip Conley: Measuring what makes life worthwhile

via ted.com

The first 10 minutes (and that high-pitched accent) are a bit iffy, but it does deliver after that.

It’s not really anything new — he cites Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and Robert Kennedy’s ‘What GNP doesn’t count‘ speech. He even throws in a fantastic Albert Einstein quote, which I’ve paraphrasedly heard before, but never attributed to Einstein:

Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts.

The point is, I think, is that GDP — and money – doesn’t really represent how well we’re doing as a society. I think the speaker is spot on with the fact that GDP is a machination of the Industrial Revolution, when almost everything produced and consumed was tangible. Today, with 65% of the world’s money coming from services — things that aren’t inherently tangible with difficult-to-measure value — it would be sensible to measure more than just our GDP and GNP.

There must be a reason there’s such emphasis on making and measuring money though. Capitalism? If so, it’s going to make it very hard to change. No doubt this talk only exists because of the current economic recession — and in it, he talks about the previous recession of the dot-com boom-bust!

I guess, while we’re all making money and everything’s tickety-boo, no one really has time to question whether we’re actually enjoying ourselves…

Posted via web from thoughts on things

Schools kill creativity

via ted.com

Look! Another TED talk that agrees with me exactly!

It’s always weird, when you have very strong prevailing ideologies, to find someone that thinks or writes or speaks in exactly the same way.

In this talk, he probably spends too much time being funny (but he is funny), but by the end he builds a fantastic case; a case that I think almost every sensible being will agree with.

My earliest rant on education focused heavily on empowering teachers — something that I later refined into depoliticizing of education and school specialization. Ken Robinson’s anecdote about the ballet dancer at the end of the speech is perfect, to say the least.

I had never considered the ‘education is a 19th century construct for the sole consumption by the burgeoning industrial sector’ point of view though. Now I can see that it’s not so much that education has been politicized — more that our societal values (or at least those extolled by politicians?) need to be reworked.

For further reading (or watching), check out Charles Leadbeater’s recent talk on ‘education innovation’: . Basically, our current model of teaching with teachers doesn’t scale to a world with billions of Indians, Chinese, Brazilians, Nigerians — other methods of teaching are required!

Posted via email from thoughts on things

44 of 52

The Chair & The Commute

Seb: It might not look like much — and the arm lock is broken on one side, so it limps and wilts to the left — but it’s my chair.

I have written short stories, blog posts and treatises on human nature — all from a dirty white deck chair. It’s where I read, too. I finished Pride & Prejudice to the sound of birds tweeting at me from their nestled seclusion just a few feet away.

It’s also where I get my regimented 15 minutes of sunshine every day, to keep the Vitamin D stocks up. At 3pm every day I emerge from my bedroom and perform an excellent impersonation of a small subterranean animal. After ten minutes I begin to open my eyes… and five minutes later I scamper back into my bedroom, to the warm glow of my four computer monitors.

Despite the tranquillity of this shot — check out the heat haze obscuring the chair! — it was actually taken at half time during the England vs. Germany match. I actually wanted to burn a flag on the grass… but I don’t own any England flags. How miserably unpatriotic.

* * *

Abi:

I need to buy a bike. I walk to and from work every day and after much experimentation with routes, have finally settled on a path that is pretty AND quicker than the others I had been taking. It takes me over the river, past the floating harbour and through Queens Park. The only thing that would make it perfect is the bike, so I’m working on that. It seems that I am not alone in choosing this as the best way into the city. A lot of other people seem to favour it too and at certain times of the day it can get pretty busy!

I took this on my way home this evening. Reflected is the Louisiana Pub near the Floating Harbour and some guy with a bald patch. But we know nothing about him apart from the fact he walks into work like I do.

* * *

Click either photo to see them on Flickr!

Psychiatric diagnosis? Pah! Here comes neurological diagnosis!

via ted.com

Watch it, it’s only 7 minutes. I think you’ll find it unsurprising that most people have tagged it as ‘jaw-dropping’.

She makes an incredibly good point, and one that strikes very close to some ideas that have been whizzing around my brain recently. Why do we use physical manifestations to diagnose mental pathology?

We actually diagnose things like depression, ADHD and autism based on observed behaviour. No proof, no science, just… interpretation of physical manifestation. It’s crazy. It’s barbaric. It’s like using leeches to suck out your melancholia. It really makes no sense, when you think about it — as the speaker says in the video: we don’t diagnose a heart condition without first using the technology available! In fact, you’d probably get a medical malpractice suit if you did — yet psychiatrists continue to diagnose children with reckless abandon.

As you can see from the talk, we now have the technology to scan the brain and deduce any extant mental maladies with excellent accuracy. It’s safe, it’s quick and it’s non-invasive. Look at those happy children in the video! Marvel (or glumly gawp) at how many kids with autism, ADHD or any other learning disability might be suffering from something else — something that can be remedied with non-psychoactive drugs. 

Posted via email from thoughts on things

Is left-handed masturbation juicier?

I’ve been told before that my brain and its thought processes work in weird yet wonderful ways.

The truth is, I only share a tiny fraction of what actually goes on in this wacky head of mine. Most of it gets contemplated, researched and then filed away, only to be brought up in relevant conversation. But not this time! This time you get the raw, unfiltered stream of consciousness.

So, there I was… sitting… as one does. I wasn’t actually masturbating, but I was thinking about masturbation. (This often happens when I look at my hands, for some reason.) I was wondering what percentage of right-handed people masturbate with their left hand.

Without being gratuitous, I think everyone can appreciate that some flexibility is necessary when it comes to gratification. But, at the end of the day, everyone has a favourite hand. So I got to wondering: is there a statistically significant number of right-handers that consider their left land the primary go-to tool for tickling the bits?

And if so, why? (I told you I think about weird things…)

Being the scientist that I am, I immediately thought of brain lateralization, where each half of your brain (we think) controls specific functions. The left hemisphere is considered to be the ‘routine’ half, where repetitive actions (speech, wiping your ass) and ‘linear reasoning’ (maths, calculation) are performed. The left hemisphere also controls your right hand. The right hemisphere is thought to be in charge of creative thinking and reasoning through novel (unexpected, new) experiences. The right hemisphere processes audio and visual stimuli. The right hemisphere controls your left hand.

You can probably see where this is going, but I’ll continue anyway. When we use our left hand, our brain’s right hemisphere is more active. It’s believed that left-handers are generally more creative and artistic — well, what if, by masturbating with our left hand, we momently become more creative, more attuned to our audio and visual stimuli?

I could be wrong — it might simply be that we need our right hand to push the mouse around — but, well, I think I need to put my theory into practice and get some empirical evidence.

Feel free to help me with this scientific endeavour, and please report your findings.

Posted via email from thoughts on things